The tables below give the coefficient for each method, with the formula it belongs to in SI units (L in metres, S in m/m unless stated, times in minutes). The time of concentration calculator runs all of these methods side by side, and its guide compares them on one flow path.
Sheet flow: TR-55 Manning's n
Travel time for sheet flow over the first part of the flow path, from TR-55 with the 2-year, 24-hour rainfall depth P2:
| Surface | Manning's n for sheet flow |
|---|---|
| Smooth surfaces (concrete, asphalt) | 0.011 |
| Fallow (no residue) | 0.050 |
| Cultivated soil — residue cover ≤20% | 0.060 |
| Cultivated soil — residue cover >20% | 0.170 |
| Grass — short prairie | 0.150 |
| Grass — dense/tall | 0.240 |
| Bermuda grass | 0.410 |
| Range (natural) | 0.130 |
| Woods — light underbrush | 0.400 |
| Woods — dense underbrush | 0.800 |
Grass covers include species such as weeping lovegrass, bluegrass, buffalo grass, blue grama and native grass mixtures. Woods n values assume cover to a height of about 30 mm (0.1 ft), the only part that obstructs sheet flow. Source: TR-55 Table 3-1.
Shallow concentrated flow: velocity coefficient k
After sheet flow, the water gathers into rills and shallow swales. HEC-22 gives the velocity as a function of slope:
| Land cover or flow regime | k (m/s) | k (ft/s) |
|---|---|---|
| Forest with heavy ground litter; hay meadow (overland flow) | 0.076 | 0.25 |
| Trash fallow or min. tillage; contour/strip cropped; woodland (overland flow) | 0.152 | 0.50 |
| Short grass pasture (overland flow) | 0.213 | 0.70 |
| Cultivated straight row (overland flow) | 0.274 | 0.90 |
| Nearly bare and untilled (overland flow); alluvial fans | 0.305 | 1.00 |
| Grassed waterway (shallow concentrated flow) | 0.457 | 1.50 |
| Unpaved (shallow concentrated flow) | 0.491 | 1.61 |
| Paved area; small upland gullies (shallow concentrated flow) | 0.619 | 2.03 |
For example, 150 m of shallow flow over paving at 2 % runs at 0.619 × √2 = 0.88 m/s and takes 2.9 minutes. Unpaved ground at the same slope gives 0.69 m/s. The paved and unpaved rows reproduce the two TR-55 Figure 3-1 lines (V = 20.33 √S and 16.13 √S ft/s, S in ft/ft). Source: HEC-22 Table 3-3, after NEH-4.
Kirpich adjustment factor
| Surface | Factor k | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Bare soil, roadside ditches, well-defined natural channel | 1.0 | No adjustment — the surface Kirpich was calibrated on |
| Overland flow on grass | 2.0 | Grassy overland surfaces retard flow, roughly doubling Tc |
| Overland flow on concrete or asphalt | 0.4 | Smooth impervious surfaces |
| Concrete-lined channel | 0.2 | Smooth lined channels |
| Natural channel with vegetation | 1.0 | Unimproved natural streams — practitioner extension, not in Chow |
| Channel with heavy brush | 1.5 | Heavily vegetated channels — practitioner extension, not in Chow |
The 0.4 and 0.2 factors are from Chow et al. (1988), Table 15.1.2. Kirpich is reliable for small rural catchments with defined channels and slopes of 3 to 10 %; on flat or urban catchments it tends to underestimate tc.
Kerby retardance coefficient
| Surface | Retardance r |
|---|---|
| Smooth impervious (asphalt, concrete) | 0.02 |
| Smooth bare packed soil | 0.10 |
| Poor grass, cultivated row crops | 0.20 |
| Pasture or average grass | 0.40 |
| Deciduous forest | 0.60 |
| Dense grass, coniferous forest, deciduous forest with deep litter | 0.80 |
Kerby's formula is for overland flow only. Combine it with a channel method (Kirpich, or Manning's equation for the channel velocity) for the rest of the flow path, as Texas DOT practice does in the Kerby–Kirpich method.
Which coefficient to trust
The coefficients are the least certain part of any tc estimate, and the methods differ by a factor of two or more on the same flow path. Check the result against the travel time along the flow path using velocities you can defend, and use the rainfall intensity for the tc you adopt in the Rational method. The Manning's n table covers channel roughness for the channel-flow segment.
Common questions
What Manning's n do I use for sheet flow?
How long can sheet flow be?
When should I use the Kirpich factor?
What is the Kerby retardance coefficient?
Sources
- Kirpich, Z.P. (1940) Time of concentration of small agricultural watersheds. Civil Engineering, 10(6), 362.
- Kerby, W.S. (1959) Time of concentration for overland flow. Civil Engineering, 29(3), 174.
- USDA Soil Conservation Service (1986) Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release 55 (TR-55), 2nd ed. Chapter 3 and Table 3-1.
- USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (2010) National Engineering Handbook, Part 630 Hydrology, Chapter 15: Time of Concentration.
- Brown, S.A. et al. (2013) Urban Drainage Design Manual, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 22 (HEC-22), 3rd ed. FHWA-NHI-10-009. Federal Highway Administration. Tables 3-2 and 3-3.
- Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R. and Mays, L.W. (1988) Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York. Table 15.1.2.
The values are the ones Delta Hydro Studio's calculators use. Last reviewed . Check them against the design manual your project is reviewed under.